Etiology of Total Knee Arthroplasty Failure and Functional Outcome of Revision Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors

  • Hussain Wahab Senior Registrar North West General Hospital & Research Centre Peshawar
  • Talal Aqueel Qadri Specialty doctor Worcester Acute Hospitals trust UK.
  • Ammar Mohammad Ali Abbas Medical Student Aga Khan university hospital, Karachi
  • Junaid Khan Chief Resident Orthopedics Aga Khan university hospital, Karachi
  • Mujahid Jamil Khattak Assistant Professor Aga khan university hospital, Karachi
  • Masood Umer Associate professor and head of orthopedics section Aga Khan university hospital, Karachi
  • Pervaiz Mehmood Hashmi Associate professor Aga Khan university hospital, Karachi

Keywords:

Aseptic loosening, Infection, Revision arthroplasty, Total knee arthroplasty.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the aetiology of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure and assess the functional outcome of patients who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty.

Methods: It was a descriptive study conducted in Orthopaedic department Aga khan university hospital Karachi from 3rd Jan 2010 to 25th December 2020. All patients with primary total knee replacement who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty were included in this study. The indications for revision arthroplasty were documented. Functional outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty was assessed at 6 months with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire. The preoperative and post operative WOMAC score were compared with Student-t test an P value calculated. P value <0.05 was considered significant

Results: The total number of patients included in this study were 29 with 33 knees. The mean age was 60.60 ±6.78 years. Majority(86.20%,n=25) of our patients were female while males were only 4(13.7%).Unilateral revision arthroplasty was done in 25(86.20%) patients and bilateral in 4(13.79%). The aetiology of revision arthroplasty was Infection in 15(45.45%) knees, aseptic loosening in 14(42.42%) and periprosthetic fractures in 4 knees (12.12%). The pre revision WOMAC pain score was 18.4±3, stiffness score 8.1±7 and function score was 72.5±4.Revision arthroplasty yielded significant improvement in WOMAC score at 6 months with WOMAC pain score of 2.2±1,stiffness 3.4±6 and function 10.4±4(P<0.05).

Conclusion: Infection was the most common cause of revision arthroplasty in our series. Revision arthroplasty yielded acceptable functional outcome in majority of our patients.

References

Mulcahy H, Chew FS. Current concepts in knee replacement: features and imaging assessment. Am J of Roentgen 2013 ;201(6):828-842.

Kim KT, Lee S, Ko DO, Seo BS, Jung WS, Chang BK. Causes of failure after total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis patients 55 years of age or younger. Knee Surg Relat Res 2014;26(1):13-19.

Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89(4):780-785.

Singh JA. Epidemiology of knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Open Orthop J 2011;5:80-85.

National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland. 11th annual report, 2014. https://www.njrcentre.org.uk.

Callahan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA, Dittus RS. Patient outcomes following tri compartmental total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1994;271:1349-1357.

Sadoghi P, Liebensteiner M, Agreiter M, Leithner A, Bohler N, Labek G. Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers. J Arthroplasty 2013;28:1329-1332.

Australian Orthopaedic Association: National Joint Replacement Registry, 1st Annual Report, 2000. https://www.aoa.org.au

Khan M, Osman K, Green G, Haddad FS. The epidemiology of failure in total knee arthroplasty: avoiding your next revision. Bone Joint J 2016;98(1 Supple A):105-112.

Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, et al. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010 ;468(1):45-51.

Vince KG, Droll K, Chivas D. New concepts in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2008;17(3):165-172.

Tay KS, Lo NN, Yeo SJ, Chia SL, Tay DK, Chin PL. Revision total knee arthroplasty: causes and outcomes. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2013;42(4):178-183.

Math KR, Zaidi SF, Petchprapa C, Harwin SF. Imaging of total knee arthroplasty. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2006; 10:47-3.

McConnell S, Kolopack P, Davis AM. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Care and Research 2001;45(5):453-461.

Laskin RS, O'Flynn HM. The Insall Award. Total knee replacement with posterior cruciate ligament retention in rheumatoid arthritis. Problems and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;(345):24-28.

Lee JK, Choi CH. Total knee arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. Knee Surg Relat Res 2012;24(1):1-6.

Garcia RM, Hardy BT, Kraay MJ, Goldberg VM. Revision total knee arthroplasty for aseptic and septic causes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010 ;468(1):82-88.

Sisko ZW, Vasarhelyi EM, Somerville LE, Naudie DD, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW. Morbid Obesity in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Significant Risk Factor for Re-Operation. J Arthroplasty 2019;34(5):932-938.

Boyce L, Prasad A, Barrett M, Dawson-Bowling S, Millington S, Hanna SA, Achan P. The outcomes of total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019;139(4):553-560.

Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper: why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;(404):7-13.

Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;(392):315-318.

Bae DK, Yoon KH, Kim HS, Song SJ, Yi JW, Kim YC. The results of revision total knee arthroplasty. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2003;38:689-694.

Kasahara Y, Majima T, Kimura S, Nishiike O, Uchida J. What are the causes of revision total knee arthroplasty in Japan? Clin Orthop Relat Res.2013;471:1533-1538.

Lee DH, Lee SH, Song EK, Seon JK, Lim HA, Yang HY. Causes and clinical outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 2017;29(2):104-109.

Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Bershadsky B, Saleh KJ. Functional improvement after total knee arthroplasty revision: new observations on the dimensional nature of outcome. J Orthop Surg Res. 2007;2:25. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-2-25.

Sheng P, Lehto M, Kataja M, Halonen P, Moilanen T, Pajamäki J. Patient outcome following revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 2004;28(2):78-81.

Van Kempen RW, Schimmel JJ, van Hellemondt GG, Vandenneucker H, Wymenga AB. Reason for revision TKA predicts clinical outcome: prospective evaluation of 150 consecutive patients with 2-years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471(7):2296-2302.

Vasso M, Beaufils P, Schiavone Panni A. Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2013;37(7):1279-1284.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-17

How to Cite

Etiology of Total Knee Arthroplasty Failure and Functional Outcome of Revision Knee Arthroplasty. (2021). Journal of Pakistan Orthopaedic Association, 33(04), 157-161. http://mail.jpoa.org.pk/index.php/upload/article/view/579

Similar Articles

1-10 of 245

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.