Diagnostic Accuracy of Lachman Test in diagnosing Anterior Cruciate Ligament injury in relation to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Authors

  • Wasim Anwar Department of Orthopaedics, Medical Teaching Institute, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Author
  • Zahid Niaz Department of Orthopaedics, Medical Teaching Institute, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Author
  • Mohammad Asif Department of Orthopaedics, Medical Teaching Institute, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Author
  • Noor Rahman Department of Orthopaedics, Medical Teaching Institute, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Author
  • Mohammad Haroon Department of Orthopaedics, Medical Teaching Institute, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Author
  • Alamzeb Khan Durrani Department of Orthopaedics, Medical Teaching Institute, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Author

Abstract

Objective: To determine the accuracy of Lachman test in diagnosing tears of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) taking Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as gold standard.

Methodology: Our study was cross sectional in design and all patients with knee pain and instability after trauma were enrolled. Lachman test was performed followed by MRI of the same knee. Sensitivity of Lachman test, its specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were determined while taking Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) as the gold standard for comparison.

Results: There were 110 (86.61%) males and 17 (13.38%) females. True positive patients of ACL tear based upon Lachman test were 36(28.34%) while true negative were 87 (68.50%). False positive patients of ACL tears were 1 (0.78%) and false negative 3 (2.36%). The Lachman test was found to be 92.30% sensitive and 98.86% specific for detecting ACL tears. The positive predictive value of Lachman test was 97.29% and negative predictive value 96.66%. We found that Lachman test had a diagnostic accuracy of 96.85%.

Conclusion: Lachman test was found to be more specific and had high negative predictive value in detecting ACL tear. It can be used as a diagnostic tool for determining tears of  anterior cruciate ligament in place of MRI in uncomplicated cases.

References

1. Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: A 21 years population based study. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44(6): 1502-7.
2. Lam M, Fong D, Yung P, Ho E, Chan WY, Chan KM. knee stability assessment on anterior cruciate ligament injury: clinical and biomechanical approaches. Sports Med, Arthroscopy, Rehabil, Therapy Technol 2009;1(1):20.
3. Cimino F, Volk BS, Setter D. Anterior cruciate ligament injury: diagnosis, management and prevention. Am Fam Physician 2010; 82:917-22.
4. Paula J, Iain M, Alexandra K, Mary J, Gayle M, Stephen B, et al. diagnostic performance of volume and limited oblique MRI of the anterior cruciate ligament compared to knee arthroscopy. Muscles Lig Tend J 2016;6(2): 216-23.
5. Crawford R, Walley G, Bridgman S, Maffulli N. Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, Concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review. Br Med Bull 2007; 84: 5-23.
6. Lee JK, Yao L, Phelps CT, Wirth CR, Czajka J, Lozman J. Anterior cruciate tears: MR imaging compared with arthroscopy and clinical tests. Radiology 1988; 166(3): 861-864.
7. Torg JS, Conrad W, Kalen V. Clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 1976; 4(2): 84-93.
8. Van Eck CF, Van den Bekerom MP, Fu FH, Poolman RW, Kerkhoff GM. Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of physical examination with and without anaesthesia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21(8): 1895-1903.
9. Shelbourne KD. The art of the knee examination: Where has it gone? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92(9): 9-11.
10. Jain DK, Amaravati R, Sharma G. Evaluation of the clinical signs of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscal injuries. Indian J Orthop 2009; 43(4): 375-8.
11. Scholten RJ, Opstelten W, Van der Plas CG, Bijl D, Deville Wl, Bouter LM. Accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament: A meta-analysis. J Fam Pract 2003;52(9): 689-694.
12. Tsai K, Chiang H, Jiang C. Magnetic resonance imaging of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004;5:21-25.
13. Fritz JM, Wainner RS. Examining diagnostic tests: an evidence-based perspective. Phys Ther 2001; 81:1546-64.
14. Huang, Yu Z, Zilong Y, Linmin MA. Clinical examination of anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a systematic review and met-analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2016; 50: 22-31.
15. Marie-Claude L, Nicole A, Nicole S, Forough F, Travis L, Richard E. Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination for anterior knee instability: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015;23(10): 2805-2813.
16. Hadi M, Ali M, Farzad OK. Accuracy of Lachman and Anterior drawer tests for anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Arch Bone Joint Surg 2013; 1(2): 94-97.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-30

How to Cite

Diagnostic Accuracy of Lachman Test in diagnosing Anterior Cruciate Ligament injury in relation to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). (2019). Journal of Pakistan Orthopaedic Association, 31(03), 118-121. https://mail.jpoa.org.pk/index.php/upload/article/view/340