Clubfoot and the Ponseti Method in 2021.

Authors

  • David A. Spiegel Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeon Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery The University of Pennsylvania USA Author
  • Sikandar Hayat Associate Professor, Head Paediatiric Orthopaedics Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar Author

Keywords:

talipes equinovarus, Ponseti method, clubfoot

Abstract

More than one hundred thousand children are born each year with congenital clubfoot, or talipes equinovarus, mostly in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) where there are often deficiencies in access to health services. The overall burden of disease can be appreciated by adding these incident cases to the hundreds of thousands of cases that have not received treatment or have residual deformities following previous treatment. There are also numerous cases associated with syndromes and neuromuscular diseases, and also patients who have had a relapse after previous treatment including extensive surgical releases. While the disability due to a neglected or untreated clubfoot has not been quantified to our knowledge, consequences may include pain and/or reduced endurance during ambulation, calluses or skin breakdown from altered loading and shear stresses, and the inability to accommodate standard footwear. Perhaps the greatest disability may be rooted in the social stigma, children may be subject to verbal abuse, females may suffer more than males, and in some cultures a young lady may be unable to have an arranged marriage if she has an untreated clubfoot. Addressing the global burden of clubfoot is a multifaceted challenge. On one hand we need trained orthopaedic surgeons who are comfortable with a variety of procedures to provide technical solutions for individual patients. At the population level we need a public health approach in which systems for delivering the Ponseti method are developed and integrated within the health system, focusing on screening for early diagnosis, prompt referral for treatment, and adequate follow-up to address relapses and/or other concerns. It is clear that “one size does not fit all” when either caring for individual patients or organizing services to different regions of a country, contextually relevant solutions must be sought.

References

Penny JN, Spiegel DA. Algorithm for neglected clubfoot and residual deformities following treatment. In Gosselin RA, Spiegel DA, Folz M (Eds). Global Orthopaedics: Caring for Musculoskeletal Conditions and Injuries in Austere Settings. 2nd Ed. Springer, New York, 2020. pp. 397-406.

Cooper DM, Dietz FR. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1477-1489.

Ippolito E, Farsetti P, Caterini R, Tudisco C. Long-term comparative results in patients with congenital clubfoot treated with two different protocols. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 1286-1294.

Smith PA, Kuo KN, Graf AN, Krzak JK, Flanagan A, Hassani S, et al. Long-term results of comprehensive clubfoot release versus the Ponseti method: which is better? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472:1281-1290.

Church C, Coplan JA, Poljak D, Thabet AM, Kowtharapu D, Lennon N, et al. A comprehensive outcome comparison of surgical and Ponseti clubfoot treatments with reference to pediatric norms. J Child Orthop 2012;6:51-59.

Svehlík M, Floh U, Steinwender G, Sperl M, Novak M, Kraus T. Ponseti method is superior to surgical treatment in clubfoot–Long-term, randomized, prospective trial. Gait Posture 2017;58:346-351.

Ponseti IV, El-Khoury GY, Ippolito E, Weinstein SL. A radiographic study of skeletal deformities in treated clubfeet. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981;160:30-42.

Grimes CE, Holmer H, Maraka J, Ayana B, Hansen L, Lavy CBD. Cost-effectiveness of club-foot treatment in low-income and middle-income countries by the Ponseti method. BMJ Glob Health. 2016;1:e000023.

Hussain H, Burfat AM, Samad L, Jawed F, Chinoy MA, Khan MA. Cost-effectiveness of the Ponseti method for treatment of clubfoot in Pakistan. World J Surg. 2014;38:2217-2222.

Johnson R, Friedman J, Becker AM, Spiegel DA. The Ponseti method for clubfoot treatment in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the barriers and solutions to service delivery. J Pediatr Ortho 2017;37:e134-e139.

Spiegel DA, Shrestha OP, Sitoula P, Rajbhandary T, Bijukachhe B, Banskota AK. Ponseti method for untreated idiopathic clubfeet in Nepalese patients from 1 to 6 years of age. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2009;467:1164-1170.

Banskota B, Banskota AK, Regmi R, Shrestha OP, Rajbhandary T, Spiegel DA. The Ponseti method in Untreated Idiopathic Clubfoot Presenting between 5 and 10 years of Age. Bone Joint J 2013;95B:1721-1725.

Banskota B, Yadav P, Rajbhandari T, Shrestha OP, Talwar D, Banskota A, Spiegel DA. Outcomes of the Ponseti Method for Untreated Clubfeet in Nepalese Patients Seen Between the Ages of One and Five Years and Followed for at Least 10 Years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:2004-2014.

Shah A, Mehta R, Aroojis A. The Ponseti method of clubfoot treatment in walking age children: Is it effective? A study of 56 children from 1 to 10 years of age. J Pediatr Orthop B 2019;28:159-166.

Harnett P, Freeman R, Harrison WJ, Brown LC, Beckles V. An accelerated Ponseti versus the standard Ponseti method: a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:404-408.

Gilani SF, Ahmed S, Rehman OU,Bashir MA. Comparison of Accelerated vs. Standard Ponseti Method in Management of Idiopathic Clubfoot. Journal of Pakistan Orthopaedic Association. 2014;26:7-10.

Giesberts RB, van der Steen MC, Maathuis PGM, Besselaar AT, Hekman EEG, Verkerke GJ. Influence of cast change interval in the Ponseti method: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0199540.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-15

How to Cite

Clubfoot and the Ponseti Method in 2021. (2021). Journal of Pakistan Orthopaedic Association, 33(04), 132-135. https://mail.jpoa.org.pk/index.php/upload/article/view/575

Similar Articles

11-20 of 65

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.